|  
   
  Optical Tables and Vibration Control
    Breadboards and Grid Platforms
    Honeycomb, Granite and Rigid Structures
    Isolators
    Optical Tables
    Structural Rails and Carriers
    Technical Reference
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Testing, Analysis and Design
    Vibration Control Replacement Parts
    Workstations and Isolated Platforms
 Show All Product Lines
Home > Products > Optical Tables and Vibration Control > Technical Reference > Why Honeycomb Structures Deflect Less Than Solid Structures

Why Honeycomb Structures Deflect Less Than Solid Structures
Why Honeycomb Structures Deflect Less Than Solid Structures


Product Detail Specifications Catalog PDF
Product Detail

Sandwich structures for vibration isolation tables are stiffer than solid tables of equal weight. For the same weight, the fundamental frequency of a sandwich table is higher than that of a solid table. Although the bending behavior of a sandwich table is complex, the following simple approximations are useful.

The fundamental frequency of a vibration isolation table acted on by only self-weight is given by:



Where:

f is the fundamental frequency (Hz)

d is the self-weight induced deflection

g is the acceleration due to gravity

C is estimated to be 1.13–1.26, depending on the table geometry*

The self-weight induced deflection of a rectangular table with simple supports at its corners is given by:



Where:

d is the self-weight induced deflection

P is the table weight per unit area

L is the table length

b is the table width

D is the static flexural rigidity of the table

The static flexural rigidity of a solid table is given by:



Where:

DSOLID is the static flexural rigidity of the solid table,

E is the elastic modulus of the solid material

h is the table thickness

u is the Poisson’s ratio for the solid material

For a sandwich table, the flexural rigidity is given approximately by:



Where:

DSANDWICH is the flexural rigidity of the sandwich table

E is the elastic modulus of the face sheets of the sandwich

tF is the thickness of the face sheets of the sandwich

h is the table thickness.

(The previous equation assumes that the top and bottom face sheets have the same thickness and the shear stiffness of the core is not significant.)

Using the equations for deflection and static flexural rigidity, the ratio of the solid to sandwich deflection for equally thick tables is given by:



Where:

dSOLID is the deflection of the solid table

dSANDWICH is the deflection of the sandwich table

PSANDWICH is the weight per unit area of the sandwich table

r is the density of the solid material

An example of the above equation is the performance of an 8 in. thick Newport table compared with a solid 8 in. thick carbon steel table. The properties of the two tables are:

The static flexural rigidity of the solid table is:



The static flexural rigidity of the sandwich table is:



But the ratio of the self-weight deflections is:



This example shows that the self-weight deflection of a sandwich table is about half that of a solid table of the same thickness. Indeed, experience has shown that the self-weight deflection of a sandwich table compared with a solid table of equal weight is significantly better than this example.
* See C.W. Bert, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1993, 162 (3), 547-557.
Note: We greatly appreciate the mathematical treatment supplied by Daniel Vukobratovich of the Optical Sciences Center at the University of Arizona.
Back To Top

 
Founded in 1969, Newport is a pioneering single-source solutions provider of laser and photonics components to the leaders in scientific research, life and health sciences, microelectronics, industrial manufacturing, and homeland security markets.
Home | Products | Support | Markets | About Us | Investors | My Account | Contact Us
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy   Copyright © 1996-2008 Newport Corporation. All rights reserved .